Laws Require DUI Offenders to Install Ignition Interlock Devices

Ignition Interlock Device Legal Arguments

For a variety of reasons, ignition interlock devices (IIDs) have long been a subject of concern. The majority of the center of the discussion is on whether or not these technologies are useful. Another point of contention is the long-term implications of using these gadgets and cars, both the advantages and disadvantages. The arguments on both sides are reviewed and weighed against their benefits and drawbacks in order to reach the best judgment possible based on all of the information.

 Ignition Interlock Device
AMS2000 Ignition Interlock Device manufactured by Guardian Interlock Systems

Since they were originally placed in vehicles, IIDs have earned both praise and criticism. The positive feedback significantly outnumbers the negative feedback. These gadgets have helped to reduce the number of drunk drivers on the road while also discouraging repeat DUI offenders from committing another violation. The mechanisms serve as a supplement to DUI enforcement, keeping people from hurting themselves or others on the road. Given the statistics indicating the clear benefits of IIDs, some have attempted to adopt the devices on a more permanent and court-ordered basis.

IIDs are typically used as an alternative to sentencing or when a repeat offender is captured. Several legislators are pushing to change this by joining other states in permanently implanting the devices on persons accused of DUI, regardless of their criminal past. They believe that using this device on a car for at least 5 months can cause the driver to establish the habit of always driving sober, even after the gadget is removed. They are aiming to pass legislation in their respective states mandating the installation of IIDs in the vehicles of all those convicted of drunk driving based on this argument. The public, on the other hand, claims that passing such a bill would preclude a judge from selecting how to sanction the individual accused with the infraction based on the nature of the offense.

That is, the judge would be unable to discriminate between a person who appears to be a belligerent drunk and one who simply took an additional sip of a drink that day and sentence the latter. Those who support the law, on the other hand, contend that the BAC reading is taken from their offense, as is the police record, and that they can submit these to a judge. They can use that information to estimate how long it will take to install the device on the car. Those in favor of such legislation and court-ordered device installation appear to have a much more planned and well-prepared case to support their position.

Some states currently require the installation of a device within a particular time frame after being charged with drunk driving. The Ignition Interlock Device looks to be a highly effective means of reducing the number of intoxicated drivers on the road for the most part. In reaction to the data, more states are making these devices mandatory for DUI offenders, and more are expected to follow suit in the future.

Ignition Interlock Purpose Explained

An ignition interlock system is designed to prevent drivers from driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. DUI offenders are usually compelled to install ignition interlocks. After obtaining the penalties and fees associated with a first violation, many DUI offenders will continue to drive drunk. On average, a first-time drunk driving offender drove drunk 87 times before being apprehended. Furthermore, 50 to 75 percent of intoxicated drivers who have their licenses suspended continue to drive.


According to these data, when a person is caught for drunk driving, it is generally not the first and will most likely not be the final time they drive drunk. They also imply that DUI offenders are unlikely to obey the requirements of their probation and may be driving inebriated. Those with a DUI conviction may opt to drive drunk or with a suspended license in the hope of not being caught. An ignition interlock system decreases the possibility of driving drunk and avoiding detection.

The number of drunk driving deaths and injuries each year underscores the necessity of avoiding drunk driving and effectively discouraging people who have driven drunk from doing so again. Over 11,000 people are killed each year as a result of drunk driving. These accidents are avoidable if steps to reduce drunk driving, such as the installation of ignition interlocks, are implemented. Keeping DUI offenders off the road can save a lot of lives. Every time a drunk driver gets behind the wheel, his or her risks of injuring or killing himself or herself and others grow.

Also, See Top 10 Best Houston DUI Attorneys

A breathalyzer test required by an ignition interlock system will not only prevent a drunk driver from starting a car, but it may also prevent a buddy from starting a car for a drunk driver by requiring repeat tests and activating signals if they are not successfully completed. Ignition interlocks can keep drunk drivers off the road while simultaneously training DUI offenders not to drink again.

ignition_interlock | An ignition interlock is a breath test … | Flickr

Furthermore, ignition interlocks are obvious, and anyone getting into a car with a driver will be aware of it. Passengers may be able to make wiser decisions about traveling with a driver in the future as a result of the shame or humiliation generated by such a gadget. In addition, ignition interlocks are expensive to install and lease on a monthly basis, providing even more reasons to avoid drunk driving in the future.

Ignition interlocks may be a better answer to drunk driving than license suspensions because drivers may still use their automobiles when they are sober to get to work, the grocery store, or other places where they need to be. They keep convicted DUI offenders from driving drunk while allowing them to live a productive life. The installation of ignition interlocks in the automobiles of persons with DUI convictions has the potential to save thousands of lives.

How Much Is An Interlock Device?

The ignition interlocking device has been shown to be quite successful in preventing drunk driving. When a person is convicted of a DUI, the state courts may order the installation of an ignition interlock device as part of the sentence or punishment. When a person has ingested alcohol, the interlock device is designed to render the vehicle inoperable by blocking the ignition system. Even while this may be a good means of stopping drinking and driving, the cost of the interlock device is usually something that the guilty individual must pay out of pocket.

The cost of an interlock device is determined by the entire period of time the device must be placed and operational in a person’s vehicle. Typically, the item is rented rather than purchased for the duration of the time period specified. The cost of an interlock device will vary based on the length of the contract. However, the leasing rates for an interlock device will typically vary between $70 and $100 per month including tax.

Furthermore, the expense of installing the interlock device raises the overall cost of the device. The cost of installing an interlock device may also vary, although it will normally range between $100 and $200. The interlock device rental and installation costs might be quite significant on their own. It is also important to remember that there will be additional fees for gadget maintenance that are often overlooked.

Ignition Interlock Prevalence Implementation

Ignition Interlock Devices, or IIDs, have been the subject of much study and debate. The general public generally accepts them and admits that they help to prevent drunk drivers from driving on our roads and endangering our lives. However, some people say that the device is dangerous to the driver (mainly people who have had the device court ordered.)

No one wants to be made an example of, so if someone convicted of DUI has to drive around with an electronic gadget notifying them when they can and can’t drive their vehicle, it’s likely to cause some friction. People who wind up with the device in their car complain that it is dangerous and interferes with safety. Some have claimed in court that the device allowed them to drive drunk (after having another person submit a breath sample) and caused them to crash. Others in the same situation reported that the gadget caused them to start their automobile incorrectly and that when they provided the next sample, they lost control and crashed.

People attempting to offer samples during the rolling test were treated similarly. These individuals were later discovered to be inebriated and attempting to circumvent the system. Every measurement has a margin of error, however because of the chemical fuel cell in this equipment, it provides exceptionally accurate samples when dealing with alcohol. However, as with any technology, individuals will try to blame any possible inaccuracy on their attempt to avoid it. For the most part, this has failed, preserving the product’s trust. IIDs are extensively utilized in the United States and Canada, either as an alternative to or in addition to harsher imprisonment.

The device has assisted in keeping an insurmountable number of car engines off when such cars would otherwise have been off the road. If such were the case, who knows what accidents and lives they may have taken? Just thinking about it makes people thankful that such a technology exists. The ability for enforcers to monitor all data from the device during calibration has proven to be a valuable tool in discouraging criminals from attempting to tamper with or circumvent the device.

Checking information on the websites of IID manufacturers reveals the staggering number of persons who have been kept off the road by these devices. IIDs are a type of electronic law enforcement that can be used when a police officer is not in the right place at the right time. In addition to DUI checkpoints, this offers them additional aid in detecting DUI offenders and prevents them from driving any further.

IID is beneficial to our society, individuals, courts, law enforcement agencies, and people’s life. These small technologies have a significant impact on how we attempt and succeed in preventing crime.

Leave a Comment