Lemon laws in North Carolina are laws that provide protection to consumers by bounding their vehicles to fall into certain limits according to the standards of quality and performance. These laws prevent them from violating such standards. Lemon laws are not necessarily applicable to the used or leased vehicles.
Herman L. Stephens
Contents
The law firm of Herman L. Stephens is situated at 200 West First Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Attorney Herman L. Stephens is a sole-practitioner at this firm and one of the leading lemon law attorneys in North Carolina. He graduated in law from University of North Carolina in 1970 and was admitted to the bar in North Carolina, U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina, U.S. Court of Appeals and Fourth Circuit. He is a member of Forsyth County, North Carolina (Member: Appellate Rules Study Committee, 1992-1996; Civil Litigation Committee, 1978; Employment and Labor Law Section; Council, 1986-1990) and American Bar Associations and North Carolina State Bar.
Areas of Practice
- Lemon Law
- Civil Litigation
- Unfair Business Practice
- Workers Compensation
- Personal Injury
- Automobile Accidents
- Consumer Protection
- Consumer Fraud
The Oring Law Firm
The Oring Law Firm is located at 705 Princess Street, Wilmington, North Carolina. It’s a general practice law firm run by the sole member Chris Oring. Mr. Chris Oring is a law graduate of University of Toledo who earned his J.D degree in 1996 from there. He was then admitted to bar in North Carolina. He is a member of North Carolina Bar Association and North Carolina Association of Trial Lawyers.
Areas of Practice
- Lemon Law
- Criminal Law
- Traffic Violations
- Driving While Intoxicated
- Drug Crimes
- Drivers License Suspension
- General Practice
- Personal Injury
- Automobile Accidents and Injuries
Winfree & Winfree
The law office, Winfree & Winfree, is located at 201 West Market Street Suite 408, Greensboro, North Carolina. It’s a sole-proprietorship law firm offering multi-dimensional legal representation. Charles H. Winfree, a North Carolina lemon law attorney. He received his Degree of Jurisprudence from University of North Carolina in 1989 and was admitted to the North Carolina bar, the same year. Presently, Mr. Winfree holds memberships of Greensboro, North Carolina and American Bar Associations.
Areas of Practice
- Lemon Law
- Consumer Rights
- Collections
- Family Law
- Civil Litigation
- Business Litigation
- Traffic Violations
North Carolina Lemon Laws
NCGS CHAPTER 20, ARTICLE 15A
New Motor Vehicles Warranties Act
§ 20-351.
Purpose
Under North Carolina lemon laws, this Article shall provide State and private remedies against motor vehicle manufacturers for persons injured by new motor vehicles failing to conform to express warranties.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.1.
Definitions
The following words used in this Article are defined as:
Consumer means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, or lessee from a commercial lender, lessor, or from a manufacturer or dealer, of a motor vehicle, and any other person entitled by the terms of an express warranty to enforce the obligations of that warranty.
Manufacturer means any person or corporation, resident or nonresident, who manufactures or assembles or imports or distributes new motor vehicles which are sold in the State of North Carolina.
Motor vehicle includes a motor vehicle as defined in G.S. 20-4.01 which is sold or leased in this State, but does not include “house trailer” as defined in G.S. 20-4.01 or any motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight of 10,000 pounds or more.
New motor vehicle means a motor vehicle for which a certificate of origin, as required by G.S. 20-52.1 or a similar requirement in another state, has never been supplied to a consumer, or which a manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer states in writing is being sold as a new motor vehicle.
(1987, c. 385; 1989, c. 43, s. 2, c. 519, s. 2.)
§ 20-351.2.
Require Repairs; When Mileage Warranty Begins To Accrue
- Express warranties for a new motor vehicle shall remain in effect at least one year or 12,000 miles as defined in North Carolina lemon laws. If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties for a period of one year, or the term of the express warranties, whichever is greater, following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer during such period, the manufacturer shall make, or arrange to have made, repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the express warranties, whether or not these repairs are made after the expiration of the applicable warranty period.
- Any express warranty for a new motor vehicle expressed in terms of a certain number of miles shall begin to accrue from the mileage on the odometer at the date of original delivery to the consumer.
(1987, c. 385; 1989, c. 14.)
§ 20-351.3.
Replacement or Refund; Disclosure Requirement
- If a car is brought for replacement or the refund is claimed and in such case the consumer is the purchaser or a person entitled by the terms of the express warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty, if the manufacturer is unable, after a reasonable number of attempts, to conform the motor vehicle to any express warranty by repairing or correcting, or arranging for the repair or correction of, any defect or condition or series of defects or conditions which substantially impair the value of the motor vehicle to the consumer, and which occurred no later than 24 months or 24,000 miles following original delivery of the vehicle, the manufacturer under North Carolina lemon laws shall, at the option of the consumer, replace the vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the following:
- The full contract price including, but not limited to, charges for undercoating, dealer preparation and transportation, and installed options, plus the non-refundable portions of extended warranties and service contracts;
- All collateral charges, including but not limited to, sales tax, license and registration fees, and similar government charges;
- All finance charges incurred by the consumer after he first reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer; and
- Any incidental damages and monetary consequential damages.
- When consumer is a lessee, if the manufacturer is unable, after a reasonable number of attempts, to conform the motor vehicle to any express warranty by repairing or correcting, or arranging for the repair or correction of, any defect or condition or series of defects or conditions which substantially impair the value of the motor vehicle to the consumer, and which occurred no later than 24 months or 24,000 miles following original delivery of the vehicle, the manufacturer shall, at the option of the consumer, replace the vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund the following:
- To the consumer:
- All sums previously paid by the consumer under the terms of the lease;
- All sums previously paid by the consumer in connection with entering into the lease agreement, including, but not limited to, any capitalized cost reduction, sales tax, license and registration fees, and similar government charges; and
- Any incidental and monetary consequential damages.
- To the lessor, a full refund of the lease price, plus an additional amount equal to five percent (5%) of the lease price, less eighty-five percent (85%) of the amount actually paid by the consumer to the lessor pursuant to the lease. The lease price means the actual purchase cost of the vehicle to the lessor.
In the case of a refund, the leased vehicle shall be returned to the manufacturer and the consumer’s written lease shall be terminated by the lessor without any penalty to the consumer. The lessor shall transfer title of the motor vehicle to the manufacturer as necessary to effectuate the consumer’s rights pursuant to this Article, whether the consumer chooses vehicle replacement or refund.
- To the consumer:
- Refunds shall be made to the consumer, lessor and any lienholders as their interests may appear. The refund to the consumer shall be reduced by a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the vehicle. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer prior to his first report of the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer, and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service because of repair. “Reasonable allowance” is presumed to be the cash price or the lease price, as the case may be, of the vehicle multiplied by a fraction having as its denominator 100,000 miles and its numerator the number of miles attributed to the consumer.
- If a manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer resells a motor vehicle that was returned pursuant to this Article or any other State’s applicable law, regardless of whether there was any judicial determination that the motor vehicle had any defect or that it failed to conform to all express warranties, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall disclose to the subsequent purchaser prior to the sale:
- That the motor vehicle was returned pursuant to this Article or pursuant to the applicable law of any other State; and
- The defect or condition or series of defects or conditions which substantially impaired the value of the motor vehicle to the consumer. Any subsequent purchaser who purchases the motor vehicle for resale with notice of the return, shall make the required disclosures to any person to whom he resells the motor vehicle.
(1987, c. 385; 1989, c. 43, s. 1, c. 519, s. 1.)
§ 20-351.4.
Affirmative Defenses
Section 20-351.4. of North Carolina, lemon law announces that it is an affirmative defense to any claim under this Article that an alleged nonconformity or series of nonconformities are the result of abuse, neglect, odometer tampering by the consumer or unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.5.
Presumption
- The law shall presume that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if:
- The prevailed alleged nonconformity has been presented for repair to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer four or more times but the same nonconformity continues to exist; or
- The motor vehicle was broken down or was found out of service to the consumer during or while awaiting repair of the nonconformity or a series of nonconformities for a cumulative total of 20 or more business days during any 12-month period of the warranty, provided that the consumer has notified the manufacturer directly in writing of the existence of the nonconformity or series of nonconformities and allowed the manufacturer a reasonable period, not to exceed 15 calendar days, in which to correct the nonconformity or series of nonconformities. The manufacturer must clearly and conspicuously disclose to the consumer in the warranty or owners manual that written notification of a nonconformity is required before a consumer may be eligible for a refund or replacement of the vehicle and the manufacturer shall include in the warranty or owners manual the name and address where the written notification may be sent. Provided, further, that notice to the manufacturer shall not be required if the manufacturer fails to make the disclosures provided herein.
- It is upon the consumer’s responsibility to prove that a defect or condition substantially impairs the value of the motor vehicle to the consumer in a manner other than that set forth in subsection (a) of this section.
- The term of an express warranty, the one-year period, and the 20-day period shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of war, strike, or natural disaster.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.6.
Civil Action by the Attorney General
The Attorney General, if he thinks the interests of the public is required, shall assure upon his ascertaining that any of the provisions of this Article have been violated by the manufacturer to bring a civil action in the name of the State, or any officer or department thereof as provided by law, or in the name of the State on relation of the Attorney General.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.7.
Civil Action by the Consumer
A consumer injured by reason of any violation of the provisions of this Article may bring a civil action against the manufacturer; provided, however, the consumer has given the manufacturer written notice of his intent to bring an action against the manufacturer at least 10 days prior to filing such suit. Nothing in this section shall prevent a manufacturer from requiring a consumer to utilize an informal settlement procedure prior to litigation if that procedure substantially complies in design and operation with the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 USC § 2301 et seq., and regulations promulgated thereunder, and that requirement is written clearly and conspicuously, in the written warranty and any warranty instructions provided to the consumer.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.8.
Remedies
In any action brought under this Article, the court may grant as relief:
- A permanent or temporary injunction or other equitable relief as the court deems just;
- Monetary damages to the injured consumer in the amount fixed by the verdict. Such damages shall be trebled upon a finding that the manufacturer unreasonably refused to comply with G.S. 20-351.2 or G.S. 20-351.3. The jury may consider as damages all items listed for refund under G.S. 20-351.3;
- A reasonable attorney’s fee for the attorney of the prevailing party, payable by the losing party, upon a finding by the court that:
- The manufacturer unreasonably failed or refused to fully resolve the matter which constitutes the basis of such action; or
- The party instituting the action knew, or should have known, the action was frivolous and malicious.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.9.
Dealership Liability
As stated in North Carolina lemon laws no authorized dealer shall be held liable by the manufacturer for any refunds or vehicle replacements in the absence of evidence indicating that dealership repairs have been carried out in a manner substantially inconsistent with the manufacturers’ instructions. This Article does not create any cause of action by a consumer against an authorized dealer.
(1987, c. 385.)
§ 20-351.10.
Preservation of Other Remedies
This Article does not limit the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.
(1987, c.385.)